Domain Registration

Has the wind been taken from the sails of Europe’s renewable future?

  • October 18, 2019

This week, German energy company Innogy and Irish company Saorgus moved a step closer to the development of a €1.5 billion ($1.67 billion) wind farm 10 kilometers (6.2 miles) off the east coast of Ireland with an application to Irish planning authorities.

Although still at a preliminary stage, the companies hope that one day the so-called Dublin Array project will be generating enough electricity for up to 600,000 homes in the Dublin area.

To those with little more than a passing interest in such matters, this story probably seems like one we will be seeing more and more of; a story of European cooperation, German and Irish groups working together to develop a major source of renewable energy for a greener future.

In an era where talk of climate crisis grows louder by the day, this is surely the way it is simply going to have to be. Or is it?

Since 2017, wind power has been the EU’s main source of renewable energy for electricity generation, with around 30% of total EU-28 gross electricity consumption coming through it. Yet, while examples such as Dublin Array show that wind farm development is continuing apace in many countries, there are also indications that increasingly strong headwinds are being felt.

Storm winds rising

WindEurope, a Brussels-based association that promotes the use of wind power in Europe, has released a new report which emphasizes the significant uncertainty over how much wind energy capacity will grow in Europe up to the year 2023.

Putting its emphasis on the extent to which European governments implement ambitious National Energy Climate Plans (NECPs) — the framework by which EU nations now have to plan their climate and energy objectives — the report warns that if these plans are unambitious, then Europe will install much less wind power than it otherwise could.

“In terms of condensing the report into a wider message, I think we have seen the amount of wind energy in Europe stall over the last couple of years,” Andrew Canning of WindEurope told DW. “And over the next five years we are facing increasing uncertainty.”

Canning says a lack of political will is one reason why wind energy production in Europe could fall behind but an even bigger reason is coordinated, local opposition to wind farm development.

Increasingly, this has become the biggest stumbling block for wind energy and other forms of renewable development, particularly in Germany, where a sharp decline in the number of new onshore wind farms has alarmed environmentalistswho feel that further undermines Germany’s long-term climate and renewable goals.

Germany has committed itself to phasing out nuclear power by 2022 and coal power by 2038 and needs to beef up its renewable sector significantly to hit those targets.

Only 290 megawatts were installed in Germany in the first six months of 2019, a fall of more than 80% on the same period in 2018, which also saw a sharp fall from 2017.

Hot air?

The most common grounds for complaint in Germany is the protection of birds and bats, which can be endangered by wind turbines. Procedural mistakes, monument protection, noise pollution, health effects and the effects on the local landscape are other common reasons why wind farms are objected to in the EU’s largest country.

“It is worrying when you think how urgent the need to expand renewable energy is,” says Canning. Yet there are many people around Europe who passionately disagree with him.

One is Pat Swords, an Irish chemical engineer who has taken legal action against the EU on the grounds that it has contravened the Aarhus Convention (the UNECE Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters) in the way it has, in his words, “forced this thing on the people.”

A legal advisor with the lobby group EPAW (European Platform Against Windfarms), his primary argument is that the EU, and national governments such as the Irish one, acting on the EU’s behalf, did not abide by its legal obligations under Aarhus before it committed governments to environmental plans which included the large-scale development of wind farms and wind turbines.

The legal action is ongoing.

The Irish government is strongly committed to wind farm development but there is local opposition

“You have to go through a legal process. That is already defined in European law. Political agendas come and go, ideologies come and go, but the environment doesn’t belong to the state,” he told DW.

Comparing the collective movement for renewable sources of energy as being like “a religion or a cult,” he says it will all make no difference in the wider global context.”Over 70% of the world doesn’t care about this. You can make all these carbon savings and then someone else will just use carbon anyway.”

He is opposed to wind farm developments for several reasons, not least because he believes the benefit of renewable sources of energy to be negligible and unproven, particularly in terms of cost benefit analysis. He believes renewable energy is not financially viable and is too expensive and that it forces up the price of domestic electricity as a result.

But his primary complaint is that the aforementioned NECPs are being forced upon citizens without having gone through the appropriate legal avenues first.

Uncertainty

Swords’ view is unlikely to be a majority one. According to Canning at WindEurope, around 70% of Europeans generally support the concept of renewable energy. Yet when it comes to local opposition to developments in countries from Germany to Ireland, that supposed support apparently drains away in the face of coordinated local opposition.

Canning believes it is vital for Europe’s energy future that more certainty comes to the sector and that wind farm development ratchets up again in the next few years.  But he is not especially optimistic.

“We just don’t know how much we are going to see in the next five or 10 years. It depends on how much governments decide to build, how they will build it, or enable that to happen,” he said.

For Swords, he sees the recent decline in wind farm development in Germany as a positive trend that he hopes will be continued elsewhere.

“It’s people exerting their rights,” he says. “It’s the fact that people have gone out and learned how the planning system works. It is all part of the checks and balances of a democratic society.”

  • The end of black coal mining in Germany

    The last shift

    This will be a melancholy and nostalgic Christmas for the people of Bottrop, especially for the last coal miners and their families. Three days before Christmas Eve, the Prosper-Haniel coal mine — the last black coal mine in Germany — is set to close. German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier was gifted the last piece of “black gold” to be brought up and see the light of day.

  • The end of black coal mining in Germany

    Black gold

    The coal was initially stored outside for days, like here with the Prosper-Haniel tower in the background. Then it was usually taken by train to the nearest port where it was loaded onto barges or ships to be taken to consumers; a large portion of it was shipped overseas. German hard coal was in demand worldwide for its quality, as long as the price was right.

  • The end of black coal mining in Germany

    Holding together proudly

    The work in the coal mine was not only well paid, the miners were also held in high esteem. Their dirty, exhausting and dangerous work welded the miners together. Even now, they all call one another mate (“kumpel”). Their solidarity and camaraderie were always a reason for professional pride as can be seen here in this photo taken in Bottrop’s Prosper-Haniel mine.

  • The end of black coal mining in Germany

    Working and living

    The miner operators built housing for the miners in the immediate vicinity of the pits. In the gardens, workers often kept chickens and pigs. Sometimes they’d even find room for a pigeon coop. Meanwhile, these houses have become very popular. Having a garden in the city is no small luxury.

  • The end of black coal mining in Germany

    Mates from Anatolia

    After World War II, many so-called guest workers from southern Europe and Turkey came to work in the mines alongside colleagues from Silesia and Masuria, both in today’s Poland. Many of them decided to stay.

  • The end of black coal mining in Germany

    The first cracks

    The 1950s and 60s were the highpoint of the Ruhr mining industry. And yet, the first cracks in the mining business model were becoming apparent. The coal, which was initially near the surface, soon had to be dug out deeper and deeper — up to 1,500 meters underground. That was very expensive and German coal gradually became less competitive on the international market.

  • The end of black coal mining in Germany

    Bad for the environment

    For decades the Ruhr area was notorious for its bad air. If you lived near a coking plant, freshly laundered sheets would turn dirty if you hung them out on the washing line. The image here depicts a skyline of coal, smokestacks, and smoke in Oberhausen — not far from Bottrop. Today, few people in the area miss these consequences of the coal business.

  • The end of black coal mining in Germany

    Unstable ground

    Even after coal mining is discontinued, it will continue to play an important role in the lives of the people of Ruhr Valley. Time and again, the earth opens up and houses, roads or railway lines are badly damaged by the notoriously unstable ground.

  • The end of black coal mining in Germany

    The work is never done

    In the last 150 years, the Ruhr area has sunk in places by up to 25 meters (82 feet). Without intervention, the groundwater would rise again, transforming the area into a huge lake. So the water has to be pumped out — continuously. This legacy is sometimes referred to as an “eternal cost” for the more-than-five million people who live in the Ruhr area.

  • The end of black coal mining in Germany

    What will remain?

    The omnipresent mining towers have now been demolished for the most part. Huge areas of the former complexes have been made green. Many former industrial monuments — and there are plenty of them — have been transformed into amusement parks — the best example being the Zollverein in Essen, which is now a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

    Author: Dirk Kaufmann (tr)


Article source: https://www.dw.com/en/has-the-wind-been-taken-from-the-sails-of-europe-s-renewable-future/a-50886866?maca=en-rss-en-bus-2091-xml-atom

Related News

Search

Get best offer

Booking.com
%d bloggers like this: