Are there holes in a central Germanwings pile-up story?
Günter Lubitz told reporters in Berlin on Friday that he was “on a hunt for a truth” dual years to a day after his son Andreas is believed to have deliberately crashed a newcomer craft into a Alps, murdering himself and 149 other people.
“We have to live with a fact that we not usually mislaid a son, though also that it was resolved dual days after a fact that he was a vexed mass murderer,” Lubitz, who bears a distinguished earthy similarity to his son, told a packaged hotel discussion room.
Investigators have pronounced that when a comparison commander temporarily left a cockpit to use a bathroom, a 28-year-old co-pilot refused to let him behind in, major a formula he entered on a sealed door. While a captain was sealed out, officials contend Andreas instituted a plane’s descent.
But a co-pilot’s father set out a following points to make his possess case.
‘Andreas wasn’t pang from depression’
Günter Lubitz told reporters that his son was not pang from basin during a time of a crash, notwithstanding a media “characterizing him as henceforth depressed.”
He pronounced that his son was on a discordant “optimistic” during a time.
“He was a really obliged person,” Günter Lubitz told Die Zeit a day before a press conference, adding that a thought he was a mass killer “simply doesn’t conform to his personality.”
Three days after a crash, a Berlin daily Tagesspiegel reported that Lubitz had been in diagnosis for basin during a time of a crash, though had dark a illness from a airline.
It has been reliable that Lubitz interrupted moody training in 2009 due to basin and that he sensitive Germanwings primogenitor association Lufthansa.
But prosecutors have never pronounced what form of illness Lubitz was in diagnosis for during a time of a crash.
Nonetheless Christoph Kumpa, a Düsseldorf prosecutor who led a German investigation, deserted a aptitude of this detail.
“We never claimed that he was depressive,” Kumpa pronounced on Thursday.
The prosecutor pronounced that he could not exhibit a illness Lubitz was being treated for since of studious confidentiality, though pronounced it ordinarily led to diagnosis with antidepressants.
A news in Spiegel on Friday claims prosecutors trust Lubitz suffered from an stress disorder.
Kumpa pronounced on Friday that Lubitz had “suffered for months from insomnia, was concerned about his eyesight, and was pang doubt.”
Furthermore, a co-pilot had looked adult self-murder methods on a internet and ways of locking a cockpit door, a prosecutor added.
‘Prosecutors jumped to conclusions’
Günter Lubitz reserved Berlin aviation consultant Tim outpost Beveren to demeanour into how prosecutors in France and Germany had conducted their investigation.
At Friday’s press conference, outpost Beveren indicted investigators, in sold Marseille open prosecutor Brice Robin, of zeroing in on Lubitz from a start of a probe.
“Everyone listened that and wrote it – and everybody believed it,” he said. “We all have theories, though theories are not proof.”
Van der Beveren claimed during a press discussion that there had been problems with a aeroplane in doubt before a crash, observant that a organisation had formerly sealed themselves inside a cockpit by mistake and were incompetent to get out.
He also pronounced that justification taken from a plane’s black box, that annals sound in a cockpit, valid that Lubitz was alive during a time of a crash. But a respirating that was listened on a recorder did not infer he was conscious, he added.
The private questioner went further, observant that there was not even explanation that Lubitz was a chairman in a cockpit.
But a Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung reports that there is some-more justification to advise that Lubitz was a chairman in a cockpit and that he intentionally crashed a plane.
On a black box, a commander can be listened perplexing to get behind inside, banging on a doorway and shouting.
On a moody to Barcelona progressing in a day, Lubitz also temporarily set a moody tallness to 30 metres altitude before changing it back. According to outpost der Beveren, this could have been “only a game.”
Furthermore, a chairman in a cockpit increasing a speed of a craft before a crash, suggesting he was conscious.
Van der Beveren conceded that he had no choice unfolding for what could have happened.
“I don’t know what happened, nobody knows,” he said.
But he insisted that “if [Lubitz] had survived, he would have been clear in 10 mins in court.”
Article source: https://www.thelocal.de/20170324/are-there-holes-in-the-official-germanwings-crash-story