Jason Rezaian: Free speech in Iran still an ‘uphill battle’

Jason Rezaian is an American journalist who writes for The Washington Post. In 2014, while he was working as a correspondent for the Post in Tehran, he was detained and jailed for 544 days. His book, Prisoner: My 544 Days in an Iranian Prison — Solitary Confinement, a Sham Trial, High-Stakes Diplomacy, and the Extraordinary Efforts It Took to Get Me Out, has been published by HarperCollins.

DW: Before you were detained, you worked as a journalist in Iran. How did you find that experience? And were there were certain limitations as to what you could or could not do?

Jason Rezaian: There are certainly limitation as to the work that journalist can do in Iran. There are official processes that you have to adhere to in order to get permission to work in that country. And it’s one that journalists and editors from publications and wire services from around the world have been dealing with for the past 40 years.

So, you know right off the bat there are restrictions about where you can travel the sorts of stories that you can cover. There are red lines that are not exactly publicized but that you’re just expected to know.

And I think we have this perception about what an authoritarian state looks like these days and how they manage independent news or free expression inside their borders. It’s actually very different in practice. There’s no one telling you that you can’t write about a certain subject. What happens is that you only know only afterwards if you write about the wrong subject.

It was a place that I worked in for five years before I was arrested. It was a challenging media environment where I tried to get stories published in one of the top American newspapers that would be different from what other people have published previously.

You mentioned that there were red lines that you couldn’t cross. Did you feel like you were still able to do your job and fulfill the mission that you set out to do?

It’s a trade-off: Do we accept the limitations in exchange for having a presence in our country or do we not accept those limitations and write about it from afar? I think that the majority of news organizations in recent years have decided that they’d rather have a presence inside Iran if possible and adhere to those rules.

I think that ultimately I was able to take a very different approach to telling stories. I focused on stories of people as often as I could to illuminate larger social and political issues within the country.

Were there are times when I thought I would like to be out in the streets covering a protest but couldn’t because I was officially warned that if I do so I’ll be thrown out of the country? Yeah, that happened multiple times in the years that I worked there.

I’ve heard from other interviews with you that you think that your detention had more to do with a larger political game between Iran and the US rather than your specific work as a journalist. Is that correct?

I believe that is was the job that I do that led to me being detained but not any specific act of doing that job.

I think actually that I was initially taken as a piece in an internal political struggle between the forward facing elements of the regime that were involved in negotiations with world powers and the insular looking forces in the regime that didn’t want to see those negotiations succeed. And I think that the reason that they chose me as someone to target was because of my dual nationality of being an Iranian and a US citizen but also because of my employer.

I was at the time the only US citizen working as a correspondent full time in Iran. So, while I think it’s pretty obvious that I was targeted because of my job, it was never really about any aspect of the job that raised their ire. It was simply the fact that we can create this story around an American journalist and use it for political gain. And ultimately I think that in that in that regard, this is the ultimate press freedom case. Journalists are under attack and targeted as national security threats for telling the truth.

Speaking about journalism in Iran, what is the situation now for the people who are trying to keep up the work that you have been kept from doing?

I think for domestic journalists the atmosphere has always been very difficult. There are elements of pressure that we don’t see if they don’t have a big news organization or a human rights organization outside of Iran’s borders behind them fighting on their behalf.

It’s a pretty thankless job to be a domestic journalist inside Iran, has been for a very long time. But you also have the example of a journalist who work outside of Iran but whose families have been targeted by Iran’s judiciary in an attempt to get them to stop doing their jobs. I think that that’s crazy.

I think it’s not a coincidence that since my arrest in 2014, the number of stories from Tehran bylined in international newspapers has plummeted. It’s not because there aren’t people there. I think it’s a sad development for the people of Iran because you know ultimately the correspondents and there were really trying to shine a light on a country that had long been misunderstood in the West.

Supporters lobby for Rezaian’s release at Iran’s UN mission in New York

Since you have been back in the United States, there has been a different media climate in terms of how journalists are regarded in the US. What are your feelings with regards to press freedom under US President Donald Trump?

I think that the press freedom situation in the US has never been worse than it is right now. We’re well equipped to fight this fight, but unfortunately the person who should be the most staunch defender of free expression and press freedom around the world has been delinquent in doing that job since taking office two years ago.

I wouldn’t say that the corrosion of free expression in America started with President Trump, but he’s certainly exacerbated it and made it much worse. You know that in the EU over the last two years you had a journalist murdered in Malta and also one in Slovakia. And you know that here in the United States we had a gunmen walk into a newspaper and shot and killed five journalists because of that they covered.

So, I think that we’re in a moment where the US president and European leaders should be able to stand up and say: This is an ideal that we hold dear and that we’re going to do whatever we can to protect.

What was your reaction to the murder of your Washington Post colleague Jamal Khashoggi?

My wife and I had the good fortune of spending some time with him socially, and his murder was a shocking and difficult thing for us to deal with. Jamal and I were ostensibly exiled from the two countries that we covered. Jamal and I didn’t agree on a lot with regards to Iran and Saudi Arabia and how they’re run. But what we did agree on was the need for people to be free and have the opportunity to pursue the lives they desired unencumbered by authoritarian regimes.

As a Washington Post journalist who was on a a similar side of one of these cases, it was very heartening for me to see how my colleagues jumped into action. It was all hands on deck in the early days trying to do whatever we could to find out what had happened to Jamal and hopefully bring him home. And then, as the news became a horrific reality it is now, an unending quest for justice. I’m prouder than ever to work at this news organization.

You spoke about press freedom and the realities of how these issues exist on the ground. How do you think these issues will fare in Iran the present or in the near future?

Ultimately, I’m an optimistic person, although I do believe that the short term will be a very difficult time. The pressures that are being exerted on Iranian society by international economic sanctions and the restrictions on Iranians ability to travel is creating a very high level of pressure and stress within a society that’s already been feeling these pressures for many years.

Ultimately, I think that, like everywhere else in the world, our ability to transmit information and ideas as quickly and as easily as we can means that history is on on the side of the Iranian people.

I think that the Iranians will have their day of reckoning and that at some point they will live in a society where they are free to express themselves without fear of reprisals from a government that can’t handle truth being shared.

Ultimately this is an uphill battle and one that I don’t think is going to come to any decisive head in the in the coming months.

Interview by Ole Tangen Jr.

Article source: https://www.dw.com/en/jason-rezaian-free-speech-in-iran-still-an-uphill-battle/a-47638664?maca=en-rss-en-all-1573-rdf