Putin seeks to ‘make Ukraine run out of bullets before Russia runs out of soldiers’

Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday announced a partial mobilization to shore up armed forces for his invasion of Ukraine. DW spoke with security expert Gustav Gressel about the strength of the Russian military and its chances for success in light of the partial mobilization.

DW: What’s the current state of the Russian military?

Gustav Gressel: Well, they’re pretty much in disarray. Russia started this war on peacetime footing, so they took the high-readiness battalions, action groups — so one battalion plus support of professional soldiers — and sent them to the front in February. They have used pretty much all of their high-readiness battalions over the course of the war.

This force is sufficiently battered; there are some formations that simply physically don’t exist anymore. They took a very high number of casualties in dead and wounded. And so this force is exhausted by now. It can’t be regenerated by volunteers. 

Now, the problem with mobilization is that you’re going to have a training unit and the next round of troops can’t be trained because there’s nobody to do that.

What do you think will be the effect of the Vladimir Putin’s partial mobilization?

Gustav Gressel is a senior policy fellow at the Berlin office of the European Council of Foreign Relations

I’m now pondering how they’re going to do that. Will they deploy these 40% of residual units they have and send them to Ukraine, hoping that basically with mobilization, with increased military presence, they will break Ukrainian resistance, erode the Ukrainian army and drive home victory? That might be Putin’s thought —that is a one-time shot. If he extends these people, there’s nothing left of the Russian army. It’s very risky.

Given the apparent superiority of the Russian military in terms of the numbers of personnel and amounts of equipment, how has it not succeeded at this Ukraine invasion?

There are many reasons. The completely bogus political assumptions with which they went into the war, the underestimation of Ukrainian resilience, the complete failure to comprehend the Ukrainian political system and how it works. The sloppiness in planning, the lack of logistical preparation, the lack of air force. 

In the first place, they conducted this as a “special military operation” using only their high-readiness contract forces without conscripts. They completely underestimated the task of commanding, controlling a force that is so heterogeneous and assembled over such a short time.

They have bad officer training. The role of nongovernmental organizations in their ground forces is insufficient. They have a very inflexible command and control structure. They have a very cumbersome command and control line for combat support services, especially for artillery and for air-to-ground coordination. It’s very bad and it continues to be bad, and they’re trying to cure that. But in practice, nothing has happened.

Research done about the state of the Russian military indicated that it was strong. Was that illusory?

I’m partly a culprit of that because I also wrote and published these kinds of articles. So there are two problems. The first is the Russian army grew increasingly intransparent after 2014. It was kind of a growing enigma, a black box. They talked about things that were not real. 

The second thing is, of course, we looked at how they did in Syria. But the exercise in Syria was far easier than what they tried to do in Ukraine.

What you’re describing is that, A) The Russian military was not in a good state before it invaded Ukraine. And, B) They have essentially not been performing in a way that Putin at least expected. So what does that mean now in terms of moving forward with this partial mobilization?

My gut feeling is that Putin doesn’t really care for the inferior quality [of new troops being assembled]. So my guess is that the overall aim of this is to make Ukraine run out of bullets before Russia runs out of soldiers.

They’re recruiting in the countryside and recruiting amongst minorities there, forcefully drafting them in there, trying to spare Moscow, St. Petersburg, the bigger urban centers — not only because these are the elites and their own kids, but also because they are in Putin’s mind more valuable people than others. So the instinct that they all will be used as cannon fodder here is probably right. 

• The civilian toll of Russian attacks on Ukraine

  More than 5,500 civilians killed

  “The Russian army does not strike at civilian facilities,” Vladimir Putin said in June. But independent observers disagree. UN figures estimate that, as of August 22, the civilian toll of Russian attacks had reached 5,500 deaths and 7,800 injuries since the war began. Here, a destroyed shopping center in Kremenchuk on June 27.

• The civilian toll of Russian attacks on Ukraine

  Chaplyne: Bombing kills 25 civilians

  A huge crater in the eastern Ukrainian town of Chaplyne, population 3,800, which was targeted in a Russian attack on August 24. The Defense Ministry in Moscow later said a weapons transport train had been hit. But, according to the Ukrainian railway, 25 civilians, including two children, were also killed.

• The civilian toll of Russian attacks on Ukraine

  Vinnytsia: Rocket attack kills 28

  With a missile attack on July 14, the Russian army aimed to hit the “House of Officers” in Vinnytsia, where “preparations by Ukrainian armed forces were underway,” said Evgeny Varganov, a member of Russia’s permanent UN mission. As a result, 28 people died in the city southwest of Kyiv, including three children and three officers. More than 100 people were reportedly injured.

• The civilian toll of Russian attacks on Ukraine

  Chasiv Yar: Strike on apartment building leaves 48 dead

  On the evening of July 9, the small eastern Ukrainian town of Chasiv Yar came under fire. Uragan multiple-rocket launchers took aim at residential areas, media reported. A five-story apartment building was hit particularly hard, with 48 bodies later recovered from the rubble.

• The civilian toll of Russian attacks on Ukraine

  Serhiivka: 21 dead in cruise missile attack

  At least 21 people were killed in a missile attack in Serhiivka on July 1. The town near the Ukrainian port city of Odesa was apparently hit with cruise missiles by night, injuring at least 35, Amnesty International reported after on-site investigations. Serhiivka is a popular resort town, especially among Russian tourists.

• The civilian toll of Russian attacks on Ukraine

  Kramatorsk: 61 dead in train station attack

  Horrific images from Kramatorsk went around the world on April 8, after several Russian missiles hit the crowded train station in the eastern Ukrainian city. Some 61 people were killed, including seven children. Ballistics experts found that the missiles were fired from the Russian-controlled territory of Ukraine.

• The civilian toll of Russian attacks on Ukraine

  Bucha: 1,316 bodies found

  Bucha has become emblematic of the Russian army’s brutal war crimes in Ukraine. When Russian troops withdrew from the Kyiv suburb on March 30, numerous corpses lay in Yablunska Street. A total of 1,316 bodies were found in and around the city, with international investigative teams citing evidence of civilian executions by Russian soldiers. The Kremlin denies the reports of a massacre.

• The civilian toll of Russian attacks on Ukraine

  Mykolaiv: 36 dead in attack on government building

  On March 29, an airstrike hit the Mykolaiv regional administration building, killing 36. The central part of the building was completely destroyed from the first to the ninth floor, with only fragments left standing. The explosion also damaged several other nearby residential and administrative buildings.

• The civilian toll of Russian attacks on Ukraine

  Mariupol: At least 300 killed in theater bombing

  On March 16, a bombing destroyed a theater in the center of Mariupol where civilians were sheltering. The word “children,” written in huge white letters both in front of and behind the building, did not deter the attack. The city reported that 300 people died. However, an AP investigation in May estimated that the number may have been closer to 600.

• The civilian toll of Russian attacks on Ukraine

  Mariupol: Four killed in hospital bombing

  A Russian air strike destroyed a children’s hospital with a maternity ward in Mariupol on March 9. At least four people died, including a pregnant woman and her baby. At least 17 were injured. Though Russia’s Defense Ministry accused Ukraine of a “staged provocation,” top EU diplomat Josep Borrell called the bombing a “war crime.”

• The civilian toll of Russian attacks on Ukraine

  Kharkiv: 24 die in government building attack

  A missile that hit a regional administrative building in Kharkiv killed 24, including passersby, on March 1. Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry later released a surveillance video that showed the powerful explosion in the city’s central Freedom Square, which was heavily damaged in the attack.

• The civilian toll of Russian attacks on Ukraine

  ICC launches war crimes investigations

  As of August 26, more than 29,000 war crimes had been committed since the war began, according to Ukrainian officials. Independent investigations are underway, and the International Criminal Court has sent teams of experts to gather evidence. Under the Geneva Conventions, deliberate attacks on civilians are war crimes. Russia, however, does not recognize this part of the treaties.

  Author: Joscha Weber, Witalij Kropman

That is incredibly depressing on the one hand.

Incredibly Stalin! I always wondered whether Putin really believes that the Russian society of the day is the same society Stalin commanded … but for the time being, the difference doesn’t seem to be all too great.

Could these reluctant soldiers not just desert the army en masse?

That’s easier said than done. The problem is, if you are in such an organization and you don’t know what your neighbor is going to do, and it’s a life and death situation, it is not so easy even if you really don’t support the regime, to drop your gun and run.

You have described this partial mobilization as essentially a last shot to break through the Ukrainian resistance. Do you think this will succeed?

It’s still undecided. I don’t think that victory is a given. But Ukrainians will have a very hard time defending against such an onslaught.

What would the Ukrainian victory depend on, in your view? 

A lot will depend on whether the West is willing to provide Ukraine with heavy weapons, equipment, ammunition to stem the tide. Now, we really need to turn around every vehicle and every piece of equipment we have in the West, and I don’t see the willingness in the West yet.

Germany is reticent to provide heavy weaponry. Do you feel that it is an understandable argument on Germany’s part?

Nope, I don’t think they have a point. If you deliver artillery, you can deliver tanks. They just need to get over it.

I think they need a big American boot that lands to their backside at a very high velocity. That’s all it needs.

Gustaf Gressel is a senior policy fellow at the Berlin office of the European Council of Foreign Relations, specializing in military, security and defense, particularly involving Russia. 

The interview was conducted by Sonya Diehn and was condensed and edited for clarity.

Article source: https://www.dw.com/en/putin-seeks-to-make-ukraine-run-out-of-bullets-before-russia-runs-out-of-soldiers/a-63220424?maca=en-rss-en-all-1573-rdf