Domain Registration

Why Mohammad Rasoulof still makes films despite Iran’s threats

  • March 10, 2020

“Your power is in saying No,” says one of the characters in Mohammad Rasoulof’s film There is No Evil, winner of the Berlin International Film Festival’s top award, the Golden Bear.

Dealing with moral questions surrounding the death penalty, the film is also a metaphor for the work of the filmmaker himself: By directing and defying despotic authorities, Mohammad Rasoulof expresses his power, all the while knowing that his actions will lead to tragic consequences and personal loss.

“This is one of the reasons people connect so strongly with Mohammad Rasoulof’s films, because it reflects his own experience,” his producer Kaveh Farnam told DW.

Banned from filmmaking since 2017, Rasoulof was sentenced to a year in prison in July 2019. While appealing the decision, he managed to direct There is No Evil.

Three weeks ago, the verdict was confirmed — by text message: “He got an SMS from the court informing him: ‘Your verdict is confirmed, your appeal is denied and you have to go to jail. Make yourself ready,'” said Kaveh Farnam, adding that the message didn’t even mention when Rasoulof’s prison term would actually start: “It’s their type of threat. It’s really a sort of torture.”

Rasoulof was not allowed to travel to Berlin for the premiere of his film on Friday. The state confiscated his passport upon his return to Iran in 2017, after the filmmaker had won the main prize in the Un Certain Regard section at the Cannes Film Festival with A Man of Integrity. The director cannot return to his home in Hamburg, where his family still lives.

Various associations from the European film community called for a revision of the verdict. “We are deeply concerned about the incarceration order for Mohammad Rasoulof. It’s shocking that a director is punished so hard for his artistic work,” said the Berlinale directors, Mariette Rissenbeek and Carlo Chatrian, in statement on March 9. “We hope that the Iranian authorities will soon revise the judgment.”

Mohammad Rasoulof

Confined to Iran, awaiting imprisonment: Mohammad Rasoulof

The filmmaker’s duty

Farnam, who also left Iran — he lives in Dubai, and his production company is in the Czech Republic — has collaborated with Rasoulof on past films, and they “are planning on making many more.” Aware that there will be consequences for having been part of this “illegal” production, he too is ready to face them: “We think that this is our duty. Artists should give society feedback on the things happening around you as you’re dying,” said the dissident producer. “And if we want to keep independent cinema alive, if we want to keep the independent way of thinking alive, there’s no other way than to accept the consequences.”

  • Iranian filmmakers: Successful despite censorship

    Mohammad Rasoulof

    Shortly after winning a major prize at the Cannes Film Festival with “A Man of Integrity,” the Hamburg-based director returned to Iran in September 2017. Iranian authorities then confiscated Rasoulof’s passport and banned him from directing new films. In July 2019, he was sentenced to a year in prison. He nevertheless managed to shoot “There Is No Evil” (photo), which won the Golden Bear in 2020.

  • Abdolreza Kahani (picture-alliance/dpa/A. I. Bänsch)

    Iranian filmmakers: Successful despite censorship

    Abdolreza Kahani

    Abdolreza Kahani migrated to France in 2015 after three of his films were banned in the Islamic Republic and he was prevented from submitting them to international festivals. “We are born into censorship. Censorship affects not just literature, music and film. Censorship begins inside the home,” he told the Center for Human Rights in Iran (CHRI) in a recent interview.

  • Film still The Paternal House , a woman with a headscarf peers at a man (Iranian Film Festival)

    Iranian filmmakers: Successful despite censorship

    Kianoush Ayari

    Getting a screening permit for films that premiered at world festivals can take years: Kianoush Ayari’s “The Paternal House,” from 2012, was only released in Iran last year after the director agreed to make some edits. But a week later, in November 2019, the film was banned, prompting 200 film personalities to sign an open letter condemning state censorship and calling for freedom of expression.

  • Film still The Salesman, woman with a headscarf half standing behind a wall (picture-alliance/dpa/Cannes Film Festival)

    Iranian filmmakers: Successful despite censorship

    Asghar Farhadi

    He is one of the few directors to have won the Oscar for best foreign film twice: “A Separation” (2012) and in 2016, “The Salesman” (photo). Farhadi boycotted the second ceremony, which took place shortly after Trump’s “Muslim travel ban.” Even though Iranian officials were behind Farhadi’s Oscar entries, the filmmaker was among the signatories of the 2019 open call condemning state censorship.

  • Film still A time for Drunken Horses, girls with a headscarf, looks scared (Filmfest München 2016)

    Iranian filmmakers: Successful despite censorship

    Bahman Ghobadi

    Iranian-Kurdish filmmaker Bahman Ghobadi directed the world’s first Kurdish-language feature film, the 2000 “A Time for Drunken Horses” (photo). Following his semi-documentary about the underground indie music scene in Tehran, “No One Knows About Persian Cats” (2009), Ghobadi fled Iran, as intelligence agents repeatedly threatened him and urged him to leave. Those two films won awards at Cannes.

  • Film still Persepolis cartoon figures of a man and a woman (picture-alliance/dpa/Prokino Filmverleih)

    Iranian filmmakers: Successful despite censorship

    Marjane Satrapi

    Having permanently left Iran as a young adult, Marjane Satrapi didn’t have to deal with Iranian authorities as an author and filmmaker. Her best-known comic book, “Persepolis” (photo) adapted into a film that won the Cannes Jury Prize in 2007, offers a personal depiction of how a teenager can get into trouble with the police by disregarding modesty codes and buying music banned by the regime.

  • Film still the President, a girl and a boy in a formal dancing pose (FILMFEST MÜNCHEN/20 Steps Production)

    Iranian filmmakers: Successful despite censorship

    Mohsen Makhmalbaf

    Released shortly before the 9/11 attacks, Mohsen Makhmalbaf’s 2001 film, “Kandahar,” became a must-see work about the fate of Afghan women. Many of the award-winning director’s films are banned in Iran, and he left the country to live in France after Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s election. His most recent feature film, “The President” (photo) opened the Venice Film Festival in 2014.

  • Film still Blackboards child walking down a deserted mountain road carrying a large board on nhis back (Imago Images/Mary Evans AF Archive Artificial Eye )

    Iranian filmmakers: Successful despite censorship

    Samira Makhmalbaf

    The daughter of Mohsen Makhmalbaf is one of the most influential directors of the Iranian New Wave. Her first feature film, “The Apple,” which she directed at the age of 17, premiered at the Cannes Film Festival in 1998. Two years later, she won the Cannes Jury Prize with “Blackboards. (photo). She then became the youngest person to sit on the jury of festivals such as Cannes, Venice and Berlin.

  • Film still Three faces, a young girl with a headscarf (J. Panahi)

    Iranian filmmakers: Successful despite censorship

    Jafar Panahi

    Winning a Cannes award with his 1995 feature debut, “The White Balloon,” Panahi kept receiving international acclaim despite increasing restrictions in Iran. Since 2010, he has been banned from making films and leaving the country, but still managed to secretly direct more works, including the Golden Bear-winning “Taxi” (2015) and “3 Faces” (photo), which won Cannes’ best screenplay prize in 2018.

  • Film still Women Without Men 2009 (Shirin Neshat/Coop99)

    Iranian filmmakers: Successful despite censorship

    Shirin Neshat

    A decade after winning the International Award at the Venice Biennale, the visual artist’s feature debut, “Women Without Men” (photo) was also honored at the Venice film festival in 2009. A critic of political injustice, Neshat lives in self-imposed exile in New York. “While I am critical of the West, women artists in Iran still face censorship, torture and, at times, execution,” she said.

    Author: Elizabeth Grenier


How the state is taking over Iranian cinema

He points out that while the persecution of an acclaimed director like Rasoulof or Jafar Panahi can gain international attention, “We are more worried about our young colleagues, independent filmmakers who aren’t as big a name.”

Apart from censorship, restrictions and persecution, independent filmmakers are facing state competition, explained Farnam: Films backed by the Iranian Organization of Cinema (IOC), the state’s own production company — “basically government propaganda” — not only have huge budgets but unlimited logistic support. While it’s impossible for independent productions to close down a street for a film scene, “They can easily take two helicopters to block the main square for one of their projects.” Unsurprisingly, “many people have started working with them,” said Farnam.

While he feels there is a lack of courage in the country, Farnam positively notes that various initiatives are still fighting to regain the rights of independent filmmakers.

In November 2019, more than 200 members of Iran’s film industry signed an open letter condemning state censorship and demanding freedom of expression in the Islamic Republic, following the ban of Kianoush Ayari’s film The Paternal House a week after it was first screened in Iranian theaters.

Film producer Kaveh Farnam (DW/E. Grenier)

‘There is No Evil’ producer Kaveh Farnam

Creative ways to defy filmmaking ban

To direct There is No Evil, the production managed to bypass the authorities’ attention by requesting permission to make for four short films in different regions. Rasoulof’s name did not appear on the forms, and he gave his directions for the scenes shot in an airport through an assistant.

Other scenes were shot in homes or in closed settings, like a prison, or in remote regions.

A still from 'There is No Evil' (Cosmopol Film)

A still from ‘There is No Evil’

Death penalty still strong in Iran

In the four stories of There is No Evil, the main characters’ moral dilemmas related to their involvement in executions are timeless, but the wave of executions of Iranian political prisoners beginning in 1988 definitely inspired the film, said the producer. An unknown number of people were executed at the time. Amnesty International recorded the names of nearly 4,500 disappeared prisoners during the around five-month purge, but some estimates go as high as 30,000.

Even today, according to the latest Amnesty International Report on Iran published on February 18, “scores of people were executed after unfair trials.” Those executed last year included several people who were minors at the time of their crime. Homosexuality is also considered a crime under Islamic Law in Iran, punishable by death. As reported by Iran Human Rights Monitor, one of the regime’s methods of execution is to hold public hangings from construction cranes.

Article source: https://www.dw.com/en/why-mohammad-rasoulof-still-makes-films-despite-iran-s-threats/a-52575195?maca=en-rss-en-all-1573-rdf

Related News

Search

Get best offer

Booking.com
%d bloggers like this: